Electrolux endorses the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) and its ten principles on the environment, labor practices, human rights and anti-corruption. Electrolux is also a signatory of the UNGC Water Mandate.
This UNGC Communication on Progress is aligned with the UNGC’s Advanced level of reporting. Where applicable, the below table indicates where readers can find examples of how Electrolux meets best practice levels in regards to the criteria for reporting as defined by the UNGC. The left-hand column indicates their information requirements. The areas that are marked in grey text under each criterion are not addressed in the report.
Electrolux reports in accordance with the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights reporting framework. A separate index has been created to guide readers to the relevant areas in the report that address human rights. Our work will continue to improve human rights reporting in future reports.
The 2016 Sustainability Report and the 2016 Annual Report reflect our commitment to these principles and the efforts to continuously improve performance. The 2016 Sustainability Report is third party assured.
See the enclosed Assurance Statement for information on the scope of assurance.
UN Global Compact Advanced Criteria | References |
---|---|
Criterion 1: The COP describes mainstreaming into corporate functions and business units
The following best practices are described in our COP
|
CEO Statement: a transformational driver for Electrolux VP Statement: Constantly improving
|
Criterion 2: The COP describes value chain implementation
The following best practices are described in our COP
|
Progress 2016: Improve sustainability
|
UN Global Compact Advanced Criteria | References |
---|---|
Criterion 3: The COP describes robust commitments, strategies or policies in the area of human rights
The following best practices are described in our COP
|
Our promises: Always act ethically and respect human rights
|
Criterion 4: The COP describes effective management systems to integrate the human rights principles
The following best practices are described in our COP
|
Understanding and managing sustainability Progress 2016: Always act ethically and respect human rights
|
Criterion 5: The COP describes effective monitoring and evaluation mechanisms of human rights integration
The following best practices are described in our COP
|
Our promises: Improve sustainability
|
UN Global Compact Advanced Criteria | References |
---|---|
Criterion 6: The COP describes robust commitments, strategies or policies in the area of labor
The following best practices are described in our COP
|
Understanding and managing sustainability
|
Criterion 7: The COP describes effective management systems to integrate the labor principles
The following best practices are described in our COP
|
Understanding and managing sustainability Stakeholders inform our approach
|
Criterion 8: The COP describes effective monitoring and evaluation mechanisms of labor principles integration
The following best practices are described in our COP
|
Progress 2016: Always act ethically and
|
UN Global Compact Advanced Criteria | References |
---|---|
Criterion 9: The COP describes robust commitments, strategies or policies in the area of environmental stewardship The following best practices are described in our COP
|
Our promises: Constantly improve product performance and efficiency
Our promises: Eliminate harmful materials
|
Criterion 10: The COP describes effective management systems to integrate the environmental principles
The following best practices are described in our COP
|
|
Criterion 11: The COP describes effective monitoring and evaluation mechanisms for environmental stewardship
The following best practices are described in our COP
|
VP statement: Constantly improving performance
|
UN Global Compact Advanced Criteria | References |
---|---|
Criterion 12: The COP describes robust commitments, strategies or policies in the area of anti-corruption
The following best practices are described in our COP
|
|
Criterion 13: The COP describes effective management systems to integrate the anti-corruption principle
The following best practices are described in our COP
|
Understanding and managing sustainability
Progress 2016:
|
Criterion 14: The COP describes effective monitoring and evaluation mechanisms for the integration of anti-corruption The following best practices are described in our COP
|
Progress 2016:
Annual Report: Note 24 Other liabilities
|
UN Global Compact Advanced Criteria | Reference |
---|---|
Criterion 15: The COP describes core business contributions to UN goals and issues
The following best practices are described in our COP
|
Our promises: Provide sustainable solutions for everyone
Progress 2016: Constantly improve product performance and efficiency
|
Criterion 16: The COP describes strategic social investments and philanthropy
The following best practices are described in our COP
|
Our promises: Be a force for good |
Criterion 17: The COP describes advocacy and public policy engagement
The following best practices are described in our COP
|
Progress 2016:
OECD Environmental ministers meeting
|
Criterion 18: The COP describes partnerships and collective action
The following best practices are described in our COP
|
Our promises: Be a force for good
Progress 2016: Be a force for good
Snapshot: Help feeding the planet
|
UN Global Compact Advanced Criteria | Reference |
---|---|
Criterion 19: The COP describes CEO commitment and leadership
The following best practices are described in our COP
|
CEO statement: Sustainability – a transformational driver for Electrolux
|
Criterion 20: The COP describes Board adoption and oversight
The following best practices are described in our COP
|
CEO statement: Sustainability – a transformational driver for Electrolux |
Criterion 21: The COP describes stakeholder engagement
The following best practices are described in our COP
|
POLICY COMMITMENT | |
---|---|
A1 What does the company say publicly about its commitment to respect human rights? |
|
EMBEDDING RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS |
|
A2 How does the company demonstrate the importance it |
Progress 2016: |
PART B: DEFINING THE FOCUS OF REPORTING |
|
B1 Statement of salient issues: State the salient human rights issues associated with the company’s activities and business relationships during the reporting period. |
|
B2 Determination of salient issues: Describe how the salient human rights issues were determined, including any input from stakeholders. |
Understanding and managing human rights risks
|
B3 Choice of focal geographies: If reporting on the salient human rights issues focuses on particular geographies, explain how that choice was made. |
Understanding and managing human rights risks
|
B4 Additional severe impacts: Identify any severe impacts on human rights that occurred or were still being addressed during the reporting period, but which fall outside of the salient human rights issues, and explain how they have been addressed. |
|
PART C: MANAGEMENT OF SALIENT HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES | |
SPECIFIC POLICIES | |
C1 Does the company have any specific policies that address its salient human rights issues and, if so, what are they? |
|
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT | |
C2 What is the company’s approach to engagement with stakeholders in relation to each salient human rights issue? |
ASSESSING IMPACTS | |
---|---|
C3 How does the company identify any changes in the nature of each salient human rights issue over time? |
|
INTEGRATING FINDINGS AND TAKING ACTION | |
C4 How does the company integrate its findings about each salient human rights issue into its decision-making processes and actions? |
|
TRACKING PERFORMANCE | |
C5 How does the company know if its efforts to address each salient human rights issue are effective in practice? |
|
REMEDIATION | |
C6 How does the company enable effective remedy if people are harmed by its actions or decisions in relation to a salient human rights issue? |
Progress 2016: Always act ethically and respect human rights
|